SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Del) 292

B.K.RAMAMOORTHY
R. K. SHIVDASANI – Appellant
Versus
EXPORT INSPECTION AGENCY (DELHI) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.SIKRI, O.P.Sharma, PINKY ANAND

K. Ramamoorthy,j.

( 1 ) THE petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs in the writ petition:

"in the facts and circumstances explained hereinabove and in the interest of justice this Hon^ble Court may graciously be pleased to: (i) issue a writ of certiorari and/or any other appropriate writ, order or direction thereby quashing the orders dated 16. 2. 99 and 17. 2. 99 issued by the respondent No. 2, whereby the petitioner has been arbitrarily transferred/relieved from Delhi to Indore; (ii) issue a writ of mandamus and any other appropriate writ, order or direction thereby directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to continue to work at Delhi. "

( 2 ) IN CM 1806/99, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:

"in the facts and circumstances explained hereinabove and in the interest of justice this Hon^ble Court may graciously be pleased to: (i) stay the operation of the impugned orders dated 16. 2. 99 and 17. 2. 99 issued by the respondent No. 2, whereby the petitioner has been arbitrarily transferred/relieved from Delhi to Indore during the pendency of the main petition. "

( 3 ) THE first respondent had filed CM 2380/99 for vacating the stay. It is stated that Smt.




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top