MADAN B.LOKUR
STATE THROUGH DELHI POLICE – Appellant
Versus
AMARDEEP SINGH GILL – Respondent
( 1 ) IN Crl. M. (M) No. 1630/99 the State through Delhi Police is seeking the setting aside/striking off of the order dated 20th May, 1999 whereby the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, New Delhi has granted bail to the Respondents. The Respondents in the case arc Amardeep Singh Gill @ Tony, Alok Khanna and Amit Jhingan. They are hereinafter respectively REFERRED TO to as Tony, Alok and Amit.
( 2 ) IN Crl. M. (M.) No. 1701/99 the State through Delhi Police has challenged the grant of bail to Vikas Yadav (hereinafter REFERRED TO to as Vikas ). He was granted bail by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, New Delhi by an order dated 29th May, 1999.
( 3 ) BOTH these petitions arise as a result of F. I. R. No. 287/99 registered in Police Station Mehrauli, New Delhi for offences under Section 302/20v120-B/211/34 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter REFERRED TO to as the IPC ). The order dated 29th May, 1999 relies upon the observations made in the order dated 20th May, 1999. Consequently, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, both these petitions were heard together.
( 4 ) ARGUMENTS were addressed by learned counsel for the parties on 25th, 29th and 30th
REFERRED TO : State of Maharashtra v. Captain Badhikota Subha Rao AIR 1989 SC 2292
Gurcharan Singh and Others v. State (Delhi Administration)
Court on its own motion v. Vishnu Pandit and Anr.
Sandeep Goyal and Am. v. State of Punjab and Am.
Chuna Ram and Others v. State of Rajasthan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.