MOHD.SHAMIM
BASIC TELE SERVICES LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
( 1 ) THE plaintiff through the above application want this Court to issue a direction to defendant No. 2 herein not to make payment to defendant No. 1 under the bank guarantee No. 796/372/95 dated June 22, 1995 for Rs. 50 crores.
( 2 ) BRIEF facts which led to the presentation of the aforementioned application are as under: that the plaintiff herein submitted an offer in response to tender enquiry No. 314- 7/94-PHC dated June 22, 1995 on January 1, 1996 alongwith an earnest money bank guarantee in the sum of Rs. 50 crores vide bank guarantee No. 796/372/95 through Deutsche Bank for the provision of telephone services on license for the service area of Tamil Nadu. The guarantee period of the said bank guarantee was extended from time to time on the request of defendant No. 1. The bid of the plaintiff for telecom circle of Tamil Nadu was found to be the highest. Accordingly defendant No. 1 by their letter dated March 13, 1996 issued a letter of intent to the plaintiff for award of license to provide telephone services on non exclusive basis in Tamil Nadu telecom territorial circle and asked the plaintiff to convey their unconditional and unequivocal acceptance of th
Rickmers Verwaltung GMBH v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
Larsen and Toubro Limited v. Maharastra State Electricity Board and Others
Ansal Properties and Industries Ltd. v. Union of India and Ors.
Ansal Properties and Industries (P) Ltd. v. Engineering Projects (India) Ltd.
HFCL BEZEQ Telecom Limited v. Union of India and Ors.
Delhi Science Forum and Others vs. Union of India and Anr.
REFERRED TO : Union of India v. M/s. Uttam Singh Dugal and Co. (Pvt.) Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.