SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Del) 969

M.S.A.SIDDIQUI
VIJAY KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.S.BUTALIA, O.P.Soni, P.R.Thakur

M. S. A. Siddiqui, J.

( 1 ) BY this petition under section 482 Cr. P. C. , the petitioner seeks quashing of the criminal proceedings emanating from the complaint filed by the food Inspector under Sections 7/16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act (for short "the Act" ).

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated, the facts giving rise to this petition are that on 30. 10. 1988, Shri S. P. Gupta, Food Inspector purchased the sample laddoos from the petitioner for analysis. At that time, the laddoos were stored in an open tray, for sale. The public analyst, to whom one of the three samples, which were prepared in conformity with the provisions of the Act and Rules framed thereunder, was sent, declared the sample as conforming to the prescribed standard but added that the permitted coaltar colour (tatrazine) was present therein. The presence of colour without a label declaration amounts to misbranding under Section 2 (ix) (j) of the Act and so the petitioner was prosecuted for the offences punishable under Sections 7/16 of the Act for contravening the provisions of Rules 24 and 32 of the Rules framed under the Act. On the complaint being filed, the learned Magistrate framed a charge under sections 7/1

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top