SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Del) 961

R.S.SODHI
SURINDER KUMAR YADAV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.C.MITTAL, R.K.SINGHAL

Anil Dev Singh, J:

( 1 ) THIS is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure whereby the petitioners seek quashing of the FIR bearing No. 232/97 under section 498a/406 Indian Penal Code registered with Police Station Bara Hindu Rao, Delhi. The petition also seeks the quashing of the trial pending before the Metropolitan Magistrate, Tis Hazari, Delhi, arising from the aforesaid F. I. R. The facts giving rise to the petition are as follows:- The first petitioner, Surinder Kumar Yadav married Pushpa nee Minakshi on November 24, 1993 according to Hindu rites at Delhi. According to the First petitioner he has been working as Assistant Development Officer in Sahkarita Bhawan, Luck- now. Both Surinder and Pushpa after marriage resided at House No. 554/37/4/ga-8, Lane No. 2, Pawanpuri, Sujanapura, Alambagh, Lucknow. It appears that the relations between the first petitioner and Pushpa soured with the result Pushpa Came back to Delhi on June 2, 1994 and on May 31, 1995, a complaint was filed by her with the Crime against Women Cell, Sarai Rohilla, Delhi. On the basis of the complaint, FIR bearing No. 232/97 under sect























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top