SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Del) 1093

VIKRAMAJIT SEN
PAMELA MANMOHAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
MAJOR K. V. KOHLI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.LAL, K.C.DEVAN, MAHENDRA RANA, YASMINE TARAPORE

Vikramajit Sen, J.

( 1 ) IN this suit the Plaintiff has sought partition, rendition of accounts and declaration against the legal heirs of her deceased brother in respect of properties belonging to her mother late Dr. (Mrs.) Raseel Kohli. One of the properties which falls for consideration is 6-B, Jangpura Extension, Mathura Road, New Delhi (suit property ).

( 2 ) IN this suit the Applicants, namely, Mrs. Harnam Kaur, Mrs. Mahinder Kaur and Shri Jagjit Singh, all partners of M/s. Texla Service Centre, 6-B, Jangpura Extension, Mathura Road, New Delhi, have filed an application under Order XXII Rule 10 and under Order 1 Rule 10 read with Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code through their Advocate Shri K. C. Dewan. It has been pleaded, inter alia, that the Plaintiff has prayed for a Declaration that she is the absolute owner of the suit property. These applicants, who are admittedly in possession of the suit property, claimed to be the owners thereof by virtue of "being assignees of the interest of the deceased Major K. V. Kohli".

( 3 ) THIS application has been strenuously opposed by the Plaintiff and it is her submission that the Applicants are trespassers of the suit property; t



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top