SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Del) 13

J.B.GOEL
SANTOSH KAKKAR – Appellant
Versus
RAM PRASAD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.L.SARIN, D.B.VOHRA, GOPAL SUBRAMANIUM, SANJIV SACHDEVA

J. B. GOEL

( 1 ) THIS is a suit for partition of the movable and immovable properties left behind by late Shri Badrinath Talwar who had died on 2. 11. 1976, and for rendition of accounts in respect of the income received by defendant No. 1.

( 2 ) PLAINTIFFS 1 to 3 and defendant No. 2 are the daughters whereas defendant Nos. 1, 3 and 4 are the sons of the deceased Shri Badri Nath Talwar whereas defendant No. 5 is his daughter-in-law being the wife of defendant No. 1, Plaintiffs claim 3/7th share in the properties left behind by the deceased.

( 3 ) ACCORDING to the plaintiffs the deceased owned a plot of land measuring 500 sq. yds. in the Colony of Burma Shell Housing Cooperative Society situated at Ring Road, New Delhi (for short the society ) and a house situated at 18, Tagore Road, Kanpur Cantt. , Kanpur. Besides, he had Bank accounts with M/s. Grindlays Bank Ltd. , Parliament Street, New Delhi, Hindustan Commercial Bank, Kanpur, Bank locker with Hindustan Commercial Bank, Kanpur, gold jewellery household property including silver crockery, cutlery, furniture and furnishing etc. , alleged to be in possession of defendant No. 1 defendant No. 1 is also realising rent of part of the





























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top