SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Del) 201

MOHD.SHAMIM
SURJIT SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.K.AGRAWAL, S.T.SINGH

Mohd. Shamim

( 1 ) THESE are two connected petitions, being Crl. Writ Petition No. 583/97 ( Surjeet Singh v. State and another) and Crl. Writ Petition No. 641/97 ( Smt. Niyamti v. State and another ). The petitioners through the present petitions have taken exception to the externment orders dated April 8, 1997 and March 13, 1997 whereby the petitioners herein were directed to remove themselves beyond the limits of the National Capital Territory of Delhi for a period of two years from the date of issue of the said orders. They were further directed by the impugned orders not to enter or return to the National Capital Territory of Delhi within the aforementioned period of two years without the written permission of the competent authority.

( 2 ) SINCE common questions of law and fact are to be gone into in both the writ petitions I propose to dispose them of by one and the same judgment.

( 3 ) BRIEF facts which led to the presentation of petition No. 583/97 are that a proposal for the externment of the petitioner was put up before the Deputy Commissioner of Police by SHO PS Inderpuri through ACP, Naraina, on the ground that the petitioner was a desperate and dangerous type of person


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top