SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Del) 259

S.N.KAPUR
IEC SCHOOL OF ART AND FASHION – Appellant
Versus
GURSHARAN GOYAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.R.MIDHA, KANVALJIT KOCHHAR

S. N. Kapoor, J.

( 1 ) IN this case, the plaintiff is sole proprietory concern of Mr. S. L. Gupta. The plaintiff is running the business of imparting education in the field of fashion designing in the name of saf and has licence to use the "1ec" logo from 1ec Limited. The plaintiff by this application seeks to restrain the defendants from using the name SAIF/saif/school of Art, Interior and Fashion and/or any other name which is identical and / or deceptively similar to the plaintiff s name SAF / IEC SAF /isaf/iec School of Art and Fashion/school of Art and Fashion, either in full form or in abbreviated form thereby resulting in passing off of its business/service as that of the plaintiff or as directly or indirectly connected with that of the plaintiff.

( 2 ) ACCORDING to the plaintiff s version, the sole proprietor of plaintiff concern S. L. Gupta conducts courses in fashion designing, computerised fashion, art and the illustration, textile designing and fashion and textile science in the name of 1ec School of Arts and Fashion ( saf for short ). SAF is also engaged, as a part of its curriculum, in conducting various fashion shows with dresses designed by its own students. SAF

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top