SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Del) 331

B.GOEL
HARESH PHARMA CHEM – Appellant
Versus
MAX GB LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.K.GUPTA

J. B. Goel, J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiff has filed the present suit for (i) rendition of accounts; (ii) declaration; and (iii) injunction. The plaintiff had entered into an agreement dated 27. 5. 1994, called "agreement for Consignment" for sale of medicinal goods of the defendant on the terms and conditions agreed therein initially for one year which was twice renewed and last agreement dated 7. 4. 1997 was for one year. It contemplated supply of medicinal goods by the defendant to be sold on commission basis by the plaintiff. Plaintiff was liable to make payments of those goods to the defendant and on the sales effected the plaintiff was to get 2% commission on the net invoice price. In pursuance of the agreement the plaintiff had furnished a Bank Guarantee of Rs. 40 lakhs entitling the defendant to claim from the said Bank Guarantee the amounts that may be due from the plaintiff towards the supply. Though this agreement was for one year however the supplies had been made upto 14. 11. 1997 only. The defendant demanded payment of their dues amounting to Rs. 45. 51 lakhs vide letter dated 15. 4. 1998. This demand is disputed as according to the plaintiff only a sum of Rs. 31. 74 lakhs is







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top