SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Del) 909

M.K.SHARMA
KALYAN CHAND GOYAL – Appellant
Versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent


Dr. M. K. Sharma, J.

( 1 ) THE respondent awarded a work contract in favour of the petitioner for construction of 1088 Janata Houses at Raghubir Nagar. While executing the aforesaid works certain disputes arose between the parties and the same were REFERRED TO for arbitration in terms of clause 25 of the arbitration agreement. The arbitrator appointed by the persona designata, entered upon the reference, received evidence and thereupon published and made his award on 14/15. 1. 1992. The aforesaid award was filed in this court as against which an objection has been filed by the respondent which is registered as IA 13759/1992. The petitioner, on the other hand seeks for making the award a Rule of the Court.

( 2 ) IN respect of the aforesaid, I heard Mr. G. N. Aggarwal, appearing for the petitioner and Mr. V. K. Sharma, appearing for the respondents at length and I give my decision on the same claim wise in the following manner:

( 3 ) A preliminary objection has been raised in the objections contending inter alia that the claims of the claimant are time barred in terms of provisions of clause 25 of the agreement. Clause 25 provides that the Contractor is to make a demand for arbitratio















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top