SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Del) 945

M.K.SHARMA
EN VIKA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent


Dr. M. K. Sharma, J.

( 1 ). Disputes and differences having arisen between the parties in respect of the work contract awarded by respondent No. 1 to the petitioner, the said disputes were REFERRED TO to the sole arbitration of respondent No. 2. The arbitrator after perusing the evidence and upon hearing the parties passed an award on 31st August, 1985 as against which objections have been filed by both the parties. The petitioner has filed objections in respect of the findings of the arbitrator as against claim Nos. 1,2,6,7 and 8, whereas the respondent has also filed an objection, which was registered as I. A. No. 7303/96 as against the award of the arbitrator in respect of claim Nos. 3,4,5, 8,11,12,15 and 16. Preliminary objection is also raised by the respondent that the entire claim of the petitioner was barred by limitation. The said issue was also raised before the arbitrator, who on appreciation of evidence, held that the claims of the petitioner were not barred by limitation.

( 2 ). I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as also the learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1 on both the objections as also on the preliminary issue raised in th























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top