SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Del) 27

B.GOEL
INTERLINK SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
S. P. BANGERA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.S.Safaya, S.K.Kaul

J. B. Goel, J.

( 1 ) BY this order I will dispose of I. A. No. 7411/96 filed by the plaintiff under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with section 151 Civil Procedure Code. for interim injunction and I. A. No. 8466/96 under Order 39 Rule 4 read with Section 151 Civil Procedure Code. filed by the defendant for vacating the ex-parte ad interim injunction granted on August 16, 1996.

( 2 ) BY the interim order dated 16. 8. 96 the defendant was restrained from acting on behalf of. H1-:#:-I. As. 7411 and 8466/96 or dealing or entering into contract with Sidel and Husky directly.

( 3 ) THE plaintiff is a private limited company and carries on work inter alia as Agents and Consultants for various manufacturers for promoting their products and sale services.

( 4 ) SIDEL-SA a company incorporated and registered in France, who manufacturers various types of machines including Blow Moulding machines and equipment had entered into a contract of agency dated July 28, 1994 with the plaintiff which was made effective from 1. 3. 1994 vide Sidel s letter dated 29. 7. 1994.

( 5 ) ONE Husky Injection Moulding System SA of Luxembuourg (for short Husky) which is also manufacturer of injection moulding systems



















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top