SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Del) 556

MANMOHAN SARIN
H. C. SHASTRI – Appellant
Versus
DOLPHIN CANPACK PRIVATE LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
L.R.GUPTA, MAHENDRA RANA, RACHNA JOSHI ISSAR

Manmohan Sarin, J.

( 1 ) BY this common order the following interim applications are being disposed of:

IA. 11883/95 under Order 1 Rule 10, CPC; IA. 11882/95 under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2, CPC; IA. 11881 under Order XXII Rules 1 and 4, CPC; IA. 4230/96 under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151, CPC; IA. 12160/96 under Order VI Rule 17, Civil Procedure Code and IA. 12838/96 under Section 47 CPC. These applications are moved by Smt. Vandana Goyal on behalf of Master Vinay Prakash Goyal as his next friend and mother and/or for him and self (hereinafter referred to as `applicants/intervenors ).

( 2 ) BEFORE dealing with the specific prayers made in the above applications and the reliefs sought by the applicant/intervenors, it would be necessary to briefly set out the facts leading to the filing of the above applications.

( 3 ) THE basic premise on which these applications are based is the claim of Mrs. Vandana Goyal that she is the legally wedded wife of Late Shri S. P. Goyal, defendant No. 2 in the main suit. Further that Master Vinay Goyal is the son born from the said marriage and is one of the legal heirs entitled to the estate of Late Shri S. P. Goyal. This position is stro



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top