S.N.KAPUR
M. S. DAYA CHAND UTTAM CHANDPRAKASH JAIN – Appellant
Versus
SANTOSH DEVI SHARMA – Respondent
( 1 ) -IN this revision petition the primary question is whether a suit under Order 37 Civil Procedure Code. could be filed on the basis of an "acknowledgment".
( 2 ) THE plaintiff respondent filed of suit of recovery for a sum of Rs. 49,956 along with interest on account of loan advanced and written acknowledgment of liability by the defendant.
( 3 ) ACCORDING to the case of the piainiff the respondent, gave a statement of account indicating balance amount of Rs. 59. 859. 50 lor the financial year 1986-87. the respondent acknowledged the same by signing it. Interest of Rs. 7,422. 50 was paid in July 1987 and Rs. 8,081 in April 1989 by the petitioner. The defendant made another written acknowledgment of the amount payable by it to the plaintiff showing that Rs. 75,363 was due against the defendant on 31 March, 1989. On demand the defendant paid Rs. 20,500 on 29th July, 1989 leaving a balance of Rs. 42,927. 50. The petitioner claimed this amount along with interest at the rate of 18 per cent from 29 July, 1989 till 30th June, 1990 and filed a suit under Order 37 Civil Procedure Code.
( 4 ) THE acknowledgment has not been disputed by the petitioner/ defendant except
Food Corporation of India v. Bal Kishan Garg
Gharabharan v. Sri Radha Kishan and Ors.
Shapoor Fredom Mazda v. Durga Prasad Chaniaria
Hiralal and Ors. v. Badulal and Ors
Jugal Kishore v. Goolb Hormusji
Seth Banarsi Das v. Cane Commissioner
Gulabchand Gambhirmal v. Dudilal Govindram and Anr.
Choudhri Gulabchand Jai v. Bhama
M/s. Sukhwinder Pal Bipin Kumar and Ors, v. State of Punjab and Ors.
M/s. Mechalec Engineer and Manufacturers v. Basic Equipment Corporation
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.