MANMOHAN SARIN
ARVIND SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
DHARA SHARMA – Respondent
( 1 ) THE petitioner/husband aggrieved by the order dated 20. 9. 97 passed by the Additional District Judge in H. M. A. No. 844/97, has preferred TO this Civil Revision Petition. By the impugned order, the learned Additional District Judge did not accede to the request of the petitioner for waiving of the statutory period of six months for filing of the second motion for divorce under Section 13 B (2) of the Hindu Marriage Act and directed the petition to be listed on 21. 3. 98.
( 2 ) THE respondent supports the petitioner in the present Revision Petition. The facts giving rise to the present petition may be briefly noticed: Petitioner was married to the respondent on 9. 11. 97. The marriage ran into rough weather. There were differences between the parties, leading to the respondent filing a complaint with the Dowry Cell under Section 406/498a/34 Indian Penal Code which was registered as FIR No. 531/97 with Police Station, R. K. Puram, New Delhi. The petitioner No. 1 and his family members were constrained to seek anticipatory bail. In the event, the parties have resolved their differences and decided to get the marriage dissolved by decree of divorce by mutual
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.