SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Del) 904

MANMOHAN SARIN
ARVIND SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
DHARA SHARMA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.S.Dalal, S.K.MITTAL, TARUN SHARMA

Manmohan Sarin, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner/husband aggrieved by the order dated 20. 9. 97 passed by the Additional District Judge in H. M. A. No. 844/97, has preferred TO this Civil Revision Petition. By the impugned order, the learned Additional District Judge did not accede to the request of the petitioner for waiving of the statutory period of six months for filing of the second motion for divorce under Section 13 B (2) of the Hindu Marriage Act and directed the petition to be listed on 21. 3. 98.

( 2 ) THE respondent supports the petitioner in the present Revision Petition. The facts giving rise to the present petition may be briefly noticed: Petitioner was married to the respondent on 9. 11. 97. The marriage ran into rough weather. There were differences between the parties, leading to the respondent filing a complaint with the Dowry Cell under Section 406/498a/34 Indian Penal Code which was registered as FIR No. 531/97 with Police Station, R. K. Puram, New Delhi. The petitioner No. 1 and his family members were constrained to seek anticipatory bail. In the event, the parties have resolved their differences and decided to get the marriage dissolved by decree of divorce by mutual




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top