SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Del) 215

High Court Of Delhi
RAJ BAHADUR A DENNY - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI - Respondent
Decided On : 02/28/1996

The court emphasized that the delay in lodging the FIR, absence of identified dead bodies, and witness contradictions did not invalidate the prosecution's case, and upheld the credibility of the witness statements.

Headnote:

RIOTS - Indian Penal Code - Sections 147/148/149, 395/397/149, 436/149, 302/149 - The court discussed the evidence related to the riots that took place after the assassination of Mrs. Indira Gandhi and the subsequent killings of Sikhs. The court analyzed the delay in lodging the FIR, the identification of dead bodies, and the contradictions in witness statements. The court upheld the conviction of the appellants under various sections of the Indian Penal Code.

Fact of the Case:

The case involved riots and killings of Sikhs following the assassination of Mrs. Indira Gandhi. The appellants were convicted under various sections of the Indian Penal Code for their involvement in the killings.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the appellants guilty based on the evidence presented, including witness statements and the circumstances of the riots and killings.

Issues: The issues included the delay in lodging the FIR, the identification of dead bodies, and contradictions in witness statements.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the delay in lodging the FIR and the absence of identified dead bodies did not invalidate the prosecution's case. The court also ruled that witness contradictions were expected due to the passage of time and upheld the credibility of the witness statements.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the appeals and upheld the convictions of the appellants under various sections of the Indian Penal Code.

MOHD. SHAMIM

( 1 ) THESE are two connected appeals bearing Nos. 75/92 and 81/92. Therefore, they are being taken up together as they have been preferred against the same judgment and order dated March 28, 1992 and April 8,1992 They have arisen under the following circumstances: that in the wake of assassination of late Mrs. lndira Gandhi, Prime Minister of India, on October 31,1984 riots took place throughout the length and breadth of this country on different dates i. e. on November 1,1984 and November 2. 1984 Despite the promulgation of prohibitory orders under Section 144 Cr. P. C. by the Commissioner of Police, on October 31. 1984 the area of Union Territory of Delhi was also engulfed in the flames of the said riots on November 2. 1984. There was a general animosity and hatred against the Sikh community as the assassins of the late Smt. Indira Gandhi belonged to that community. The Sikhs were thus killed. Their houses and properties were set at flame. There was a general break down of law and order, complete chaos and anarchy prevailed in even, nook and corner of the city of Delhi as a corollary whereof no formal complaint was lodged with regard to the incidents which took place on the above-mentioned dates. However, one Bhajan Singh (Public Witness4) lodged a report with SI Krishan Kumar (Public Witness 16) of police station Sultanpuri, Delhi, with regard to the aforementioned incidents which took place on November 2. 1984. The S. I. sent the said report to the police station for registration of a formal F. I. R. alongwith his endorsement and the said F. I. R. was registered by ASI Ghasi Ram (Public Witnessl7) vide Ex. Public Witnessl 7/a. He stated therein with regard to large-scale killings of the Sikhs of residents ofa-4 Block, Sultanpuri. He also brought to the notice of the authority the factum of setting on fire the houses belonging to the Sikhs and the fact of their being robbed by the mob. He further disclosed that his household goods such as utensils and clothes were removed. His auto-rickshaw bearing registration No. DER-3832 was set ablaze. According to him, similar incidents also took place in F, G and H Blocks of Sultanpuri.

( 2 ) THE machinery of law was set in motion on the basis of the said F. I. R. During the course of investigation of the said F. I. R. several other incidents were taken note of. Separate charge-sheets were prepared and filed in courts in regard to the separate incidents. The instant case relates to the Sikhs residents of house No. P-3/343, P-3/344, P-3/370 and P-3/371, Sultanpuri wherein four persons known as Balwant Singh, Kirpal Singh, Sher Singh and Pritam Singh were done to death by members of an unlawful assembly, including the present accused persons ( hereinafter referred to as the appellants in order to facilitate the reference) on November 2,1984 at about 7. 00 a. m. During the course of the said incident one Puran Singh (Public Witness5) also incurred the wrath of the abovesaid unlawful assembly being a Sikh. As such, he was attacked and was injured. He was later on sent to the hospital, Damzel luck smiled on him and he survived.

( 3 ) FOUR dead bodies of certain un-known persons were recovered on November 2,1984 by SI Sukhbir Singh from P-3 Block of Sultanpuri. He prepared inquest reports with regard to the said four dead bodies vide Ex. Public Witness2/a, Ex. Public Witness2/b, Ex. Public Witness2/c and Ex. Public Witness2/d. He got the said dead bodies identified at the mortuary. Thereafter he sent the dead bodies for the purposes of post-mortem through Constables Kaptan Singh and Dinesh. The post-mortem on the said dead bodies was conducted by Dr. L. T. Ramani (Public Witness7) vide Ex. Public Witness7/a, Ex. Public Witness7/b, Ex. Public Witness7/c and Ex. Public Witness7/d. During the course of the investigation it transpired that the appellants were involved in the incident dated November 2. 1984 w hich resulted in the killings of the four persons alongwith other members




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top