MOHD.SHAMIM, P.K.BAHRI
ZAMIR AHMED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 13/05/1992 passed by the learned Additionalsessions Judge. Delhi where through the convict (hereinafter referred to as the appellant for the sake of convenience) was found guiltyundersection 36313661376 of the Indian Penal Code and senteencedto various terms of imprisonment. He was sentenced to undergolife imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 2,000. 00 under Section 376 ofthe Indian Penal Code. In case of his failute to clear the fine hewas directed to undergo R. I. for two years. He was further sentenced to undergo R. 1. for a term of 7 years with a fine of Rs. 1000. 00for an offence under Section ?66 of the Indian Penal Code. In caseof fine not being paid he was directed to undergo R. I. for a periodof one year under the said Section. He was then sentenced toundergo R. I. for two years under Section 363 of the Indian Penalcode All the sentences were directed to run concurrently.
( 2 ) THE case of the prosecution as set out in D. D. report No19-A (Ex. Public Witness -2/a), F. I. R. Ex. Public Witness -9/a and the report undersection 173 Criminal Procedure Code. is as under : that HC Omvir Singh (PW-13)w
REFERRED TO : Syed Akbar V. State of Kamataka
Sat Pal V. Delhi Administration
State of U.P. V. Chet Ram and Ors.
Boya Ganganna and Anr. V. State of Andhra Pradesh
State of Maharashtra V. Chaderprakash Kewal Chand Jain
Caetano Piedade Femandes and Anr. V. Union Territory of Goa, Daman and Diu, Panaji, Goa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.