SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Del) 193

MOHD.SHAMIM, P.K.BAHRI
ZAMIR AHMED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


MOHD. SHAMIM, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 13/05/1992 passed by the learned Additionalsessions Judge. Delhi where through the convict (hereinafter referred to as the appellant for the sake of convenience) was found guiltyundersection 36313661376 of the Indian Penal Code and senteencedto various terms of imprisonment. He was sentenced to undergolife imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 2,000. 00 under Section 376 ofthe Indian Penal Code. In case of his failute to clear the fine hewas directed to undergo R. I. for two years. He was further sentenced to undergo R. 1. for a term of 7 years with a fine of Rs. 1000. 00for an offence under Section ?66 of the Indian Penal Code. In caseof fine not being paid he was directed to undergo R. I. for a periodof one year under the said Section. He was then sentenced toundergo R. I. for two years under Section 363 of the Indian Penalcode All the sentences were directed to run concurrently.

( 2 ) THE case of the prosecution as set out in D. D. report No19-A (Ex. Public Witness -2/a), F. I. R. Ex. Public Witness -9/a and the report undersection 173 Criminal Procedure Code. is as under : that HC Omvir Singh (PW-13)w





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top