SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Del) 93

N.G.NANDI
OM BUILDERS PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
EDWARD KEVENTER (SUCCESSORS)PVT. LTD – Respondent


( 1 ) IN the suit for permanent injunction, seeking to restrain the defendants from selling or otherwise transferring Plot No. 48, admeasuring 25 acres of land situated at Kaventras Land, Sardar Patel Marg, Chanakya Puri, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as "the suit property") without first offering the same to the plaintiff, defendant No. 2, by this IA, under Order 7, Rule 11, CPC prays for rejection of the plaint stating that the plaintiff has alleged that the defendants had entered into an oral agreement with the plaintiff to sell the suit property to the plaintiff for a sum of Rs. 24. 50 crores, further alleging that in terms of the said oral agreement and the subsequent discussion, the defendants had unequivocally and unconditionally undertaken an obligation to give the plaintiff the first option to purchase the suit property and that the plaintiff alleged to have acquired a legal right to enforce the agreement and also negative covenant regarding the said first option, further alleging that the plaintiff is ready and willing to perform his part of the agreement and the defendants are not performing their part of the agreement and that the defendants will sell or otherwise










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top