SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Del) 290

M.K.SHARMA, M.JAGANNADHA RAO
D. T. T. D. C. – Appellant
Versus
D. R. MEHRA AND SONS. – Respondent


M. Jagannadha Rao, C. J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiff is the appellant in Suit No. 1693/95. This appeal is preferred TO against the order in IA 7540 of 1995 and IA 7930 of 1995 dated 8. 11. 1995 vacating the temporary injunction granted earlier on 24. 7. 95.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case are as follows:

( 3 ) THE appellant Corporation wanted to run a liquor shop and gave an advertisement on 16. 4. 82 inviting tenders from owners of shops for entering into a licence agreement. The respondent-owners submitted their offers and the said offer was accepted by the appellant on 3. 5. 82. Thereafter a licence deed was executed on 5. 5. 1982 whereby the appellant agreed to pay certain percentage as compensation with a minimum guarantee of Rs. 6,000. 00 p. m. The licence was to be upto 31. 3. 83. It was continued upto 31. 3. 84. On 1. 6. 84, appelllant wrote to the owners inquiring if the respondent would allow appellant to continue till 31. 3. 85. By letter dated 22. 11. 84, the appellant wrote to respondent that it would increase the commission at 10% of gross profit with a minimum of Rs. 4,000. 00 p. m. w. e. f. 1. 4,1984. On 13. 6. 86, appellant wroe to respondent agreeing to pay a percentage of it





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top