M.K.SHARMA, M.JAGANNADHA RAO
D. T. T. D. C. – Appellant
Versus
D. R. MEHRA AND SONS. – Respondent
( 1 ) THE plaintiff is the appellant in Suit No. 1693/95. This appeal is preferred TO against the order in IA 7540 of 1995 and IA 7930 of 1995 dated 8. 11. 1995 vacating the temporary injunction granted earlier on 24. 7. 95.
( 2 ) THE facts of the case are as follows:
( 3 ) THE appellant Corporation wanted to run a liquor shop and gave an advertisement on 16. 4. 82 inviting tenders from owners of shops for entering into a licence agreement. The respondent-owners submitted their offers and the said offer was accepted by the appellant on 3. 5. 82. Thereafter a licence deed was executed on 5. 5. 1982 whereby the appellant agreed to pay certain percentage as compensation with a minimum guarantee of Rs. 6,000. 00 p. m. The licence was to be upto 31. 3. 83. It was continued upto 31. 3. 84. On 1. 6. 84, appelllant wrote to the owners inquiring if the respondent would allow appellant to continue till 31. 3. 85. By letter dated 22. 11. 84, the appellant wrote to respondent that it would increase the commission at 10% of gross profit with a minimum of Rs. 4,000. 00 p. m. w. e. f. 1. 4,1984. On 13. 6. 86, appellant wroe to respondent agreeing to pay a percentage of it
Bhawani Investments Ltd. vs. Shree Properties
Patel Exhibitors (Pvt) Ltd. vs. The Corporation of the City of Bangalore
Bhola Nath vs. Maharao Raj Saheb Bundi State
Dalpat Kumar vs. Prahalad Singh
REFERRED TO : Yashwant Singh vs. Jagdish Singh
Krishna Ram Mohale vs. Mrs. Shobha Venkata Rao
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.