SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Del) 295

MOHD.SHAMIM, P.K.BAHRI
MAHINDER KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


MOHD. SHAMIM, J.

( 1 ) THE convict-appellant (hereinafter rererred to as the appelicant for the sake or convenience) challenges through the present appeal, judgement and order dated May 6, 1992 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, whereby he was found gullty under section 302 of the indian Panel Code and sentenced to undergo ngorous imprisonment for life with a fine or Rs. 500. In case of his failure to clear the fine, he was further directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months.

( 2 ) BRIEF facts which led to the presentation of the present appeal are As under : that one Smt. Devki (Public Witness 10) was putting up at House No. 2461, Katra Banwari Lal, alongwith her sons and daughters, exeluding the appellant, who also hapapens to be her son, as a tenant on a monthly rent of Rs. 2. 50 since the time of her foretathers. The appellant, who is married, has been living separately from the members of his family in a house at Jheel, Snahdara, Delhi alongwith his wife and children.

( 3 ) THE bone of contention in between the appellant and his mother and other brother was the above said tenanted accommodation. Smt. Devki wanted to vacate the said house and t
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top