SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Del) 818

M.K.SHARMA
PISHORI LAL MAGGO – Appellant
Versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent


M. K. Sharma, J.

( 1 ) THE Arbitrator filed the award alongwith the proceedings on filing of which the present suit was registered and notices were issued to the parties directing the parties to file the objections within the statutory time limit. On service of notice the petitioner did not file any objection but the respondents filed their objections under Sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act which was registered as I. A. No. 6320/1994. The petitioner filed his reply to the aforesaid objections filed by the respondents.

( 2 ) IN the objections filed by the respondents objections were taken with regard to the award passed by the Arbitrator in respect of Claim No. 2,3,4,8 and 9.

( 3 ) I have heard the learned Counsel for the parties who have taken me through the grounds of objections, the award passed by the Arbitrator and also the records of the arbitration proceedings. On consideration of the materials on record and upon hearing the Counsel for the parties I propose to dispose of the present objections filed by the respondents dealing with each of the objections claim-wise as follows :

( 4 ) CLAIM No. 2: The objections raised against the award of the Arbitrator in respect of c











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top