D.K.JAIN, M.JAGANNADHA RAO
DALBIR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
( 1 ) THE petitioner has been detained under Section 3 (1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter called the COFEPOSA) by the State Government by an order dated 28. 4. 1993 of the Deputy Secretary (Home) of the National Capital Territory of Delhi, (2nd respondent ).
( 2 ) THE incident occurred on 21. 12. 1992 when the petitioner reported at the Customs departure hall, after clearing from immigration to travel to Hongkong on flight dated 21. 12. 92. After customs clearance pursuant to his declaration, he was stopped and on personal search, it came to light that he had concealed foreign currency equivalent to Rs. 1,49,462. 00 in his rectum. Petitioner could not produce evidence of lawful possession. It is said that he made a statement on 21. 12. 92 under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962 admitting that he was illegally carrying the currency and that he was doing so for Rs. 5,000. 00 which he was to receive from one Mohan Singh at Hongkong to whom he was to handover the foreign currency. It is not necessary to refer in detail to other part of his statement except that he was doing this on variou
Relied on : Shiv Ratan Makim v. Union of India
Yogendra Murari v. State of U.P.
Hemlata Kantilal Shah v. State of Maharashtra
Syed Farooq Mohd. v. Union of India
Rajendra Kumar Natvarlal Shah v. State of Gujarat
Pradeep Nilkanth Paturkar v. Shri S. Ramamurthi
Relied on : Farooq Mohd v. Union of India
Bhawarlal Ganeshmalji v. State of TN
Sharad Kumar Tyagi v. State of UP
relied : Shafiq Ahmed Vs. D.M.
Indradeo Mahato v. State of W.B.
T.A. Abdul Rahman v. State of Kerala
M. Ahmed Kutty v. Union of India
M. Mohammed Sulthan vs. Joint Secretary
REFERRED TO : Kamarunnisa v. Union of India
Subhash Muljimal Gandhi v. L. Himingliana
distinguished : Pawan Kumar v. Union of India
REFERRED TO : Khudi Ram Das v. State of West Bengal
relied : Vakil Singh v. State of Jammu and Kashmir
Madan Lal Anand v. Union of India
relied : Abdul Sathar Ibrahim Manik vs. Union of India
Abdul Sathar Abdul Kadar Shaik v. Union of India
L.M.S. Umma Saleem v. B.B.Gujaral
Dhananjoy Das vs. District Magistrate
REFERRED TO : Haridas Amarchand Shah v. K.L. Verma
Explained : Smt. Shalini Soni v. UOI
Jagdish Mitra v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.