S.C.AGRAWAL, A.M.AHMADI
Kamarunnissa: Badhrunnissa: Sithy Aysha: Kamarunnissa: Badhrunnissa: Sithy Aysha – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
AHMADI, J.:—Three persons, namely (1) M. M. Shahul Hameed alias Gani Aslam, (2) Haja Mohideen alias Shahul Hameed Asarudeen and (3) Naina Mohammed alias Raja Mohd. Zafar were intercepted by the officers of Department of Revenue Intelligence on 5th October, 1989 at the Sahar International Airport, Bombay, as they were suspected to be involved in smuggling activities. They were escorted to the office of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Waldorf, Colaba, Bombay, where they were interrogated. On interrogation it was found that M. M. Shahul Hameed was to board flight No. CX-750 to Hongkong while the other two were to proceed to Dubai by Emirate Flight No. E-5 10 on that day. The said three persons were searched. Two balloon covered rolls secreted in the rectum of M. M. Shahul Hameed were removed and were found to contain diamonds and precious stones weighing about 905.70 carats and 77.37 carats, respectively. The said diamonds and precious stones valued at about Rs. 70 lacs were attached under a Panchnama. In addition to the same foreign currency of the value of Rs. 10,706 was also recovered and attached. His passport was also seized.
2. The other two persons were found to ha
relied on : Vijay Narain Singh v. State of Bihar
Dhamendra Suganchand Chelawat v. Union of India
Ramesh Yadav v. District Magistrate, Etah
Suraj Pal Sahu v. State of Maharashtra
Binod S Singh v. District Magistrate, Dhanbad
Abdul RazakAbdul Wohab Sheikh v. S.N. Sinha, Commissioner of Police
N. Meera Rani v. State of Tamil Nadu
Shashi Aggarwal v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.