SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Del) 233

DEVENDER GUPTA
STEPHEN JOSHUS – Appellant
Versus
J. D. KAPOOR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
SANJIV SARASVAT, Vikramjit Sen

Devinder Gupta, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners are Indian Christians and were married to each other on 25th August, 1973 under the provisions of the Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872. A joint petition was preferred by them under Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) seeking the dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce by mutual consent. Petition was dismissed on 5. 10. 1991 by Shri J. D. Kapur, Additional District Judge, Delhi. One of the grounds for dismissal was that the marriage was solemnised under the Christian Marriage Act whereas divorce had been sought under the Special Marriage Act, therefore, the petition was not maintainable. Petitioners have questioned the decision in this petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and under Section 39 of the Act.

( 2 ) I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.

( 3 ) THE contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners has been that Special Marriage Act, 1954 is a piece of legislation, which applies equally to all citizens of India, therefore, irrespective of the fact that the marriage was solemnised under some other provisions of law, section 28 thereof









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top