SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Del) 701

ARUN KUMAR
SWARN KANTA MEHRA – Appellant
Versus
VINAY KUMAR MAHENDRA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.K.AGRAWAL, V.K.Jaitley, Vijay Kishan

Arun Kumar, J.

( 1 ) THIS is yet another case in which inspite of the fact that the premises was let out under Section 21 of the Delhi Rent Control Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act), after obtaining permission of the Controller, the respondent/tenant has continued in possession of the premises till date though the period of limited tenancy expired on 30th April 1983.

( 2 ). Briefly the facts are that the appellant is the owner/landlady of a double storey house bearing No. G-211, Naraina Residential Scheme, Naraina Vihar, New Delhi. The appellant was occupying the first floor of the said property. She applied to the Controller on 20th April 1979 under Section 21 of the Act for permission to let out the ground floor of the said property at a monthly rent of Rs. 1150. 00 exclusive of water and electricity charges for residential purposes to the respondent with effect from the date of permission for a period of four years. On 26th April 1979 statements of the appellant as well as the respondent were recorded by the Controller and by an order passed on the said date, the Controller granted permission under Section 21 of the Act to the appellant to let out ground floor of her said








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top