SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Del) 138

ARUN KUMAR
SUNIL PURI – Appellant
Versus
MODI SPINNING AND WEAVING MILLS COMPANY LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.L.TANDON, RAJIV NAYAR, Ravinder Sethi, V.K.Makhija, VIJAY GUPTA

Mr. Arun Kumar, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a review application under Section 114 read withorder IXVII, Rule 1 and Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure. The applicationseeks review of the judgment dated 10/03/1993 delivered by Hon ble Ms. Justice Santosh Duggal. The application was filed on 17/04/1993, i. e. after theretirement of the learned Single Judge who had passed the judgment.

( 2 ). An objection has been raised on behalf of the appellant/non-applicant thatthe application is an abuse of the process of the Court and has been filed knowingfully well that the Hon ble Judge who decided the matter had retired. Thejudgment was dictated in open Court and if the applicant/respondent had anygrievance the same could have been pointed out to the Court then and there ratherthan moving the present application after the learned Judge had retired on20. 3. 1993.

( 3 ). In reply to this objection it has been submitted on behalf of the applicant thatthe applicant tried to obtain copy of the order after the same had been dictated inopen Court by way of inspection of the Court file. However, the file was not madeavailable till the date of the retirement of the learned Judge. Therefore, the application





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top