SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Del) 979

B.K.RAMAMOORTHY
COMPETITION REVIEW PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
N. N. OHJA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.K.PURI, Y.K.Kapur

K. Ramamoorthy

( 1 ) THE plaintiff has prayed for injunction restraining the defendants from publishing competition (Success) Review and from adopting the name deceptively similar to the plaintiff. The case of the plaintiff briefly stated as follows:

( 2 ) THE plaintiff Company started its business in the year 1964 in publishing the book competition Success Review and the words success added in the year 1971. The trade name of the plaintiff Competition Review appears in a special and particular manner in para 4 of the plaint. The Plaintiff has given a description of this book. Para 4 of the plaint is as follows: "that the trade name of the plaintiff "competition review" appears in a special and particular manner on each of its monthly issue/publication. The word competition is written in small alphabets with a capital c , followed by the word review below the word Competition which is much smaller in size The word success is in a rectangular box below the word competition and before the word review on the left side of the cover page the word Competition stretches across the front page followed by the word Review below it on the right side of the front page On top of the





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top