SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Del) 143

SANTOSH DUGGAL
PREM SINGH – Appellant
Versus
CEEAM AUTO INDUSTRIES – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.P.SETH, K.L.AGARWAL, M.M.SINGH, R.K.AGARWAL

SANTOSH DUGGAL, J.

( 1 ) THIS is plaintiff s application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 read with section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code, who has brought a suit seeking is liancs of permanent injunction against the defendant, asserting to be a registered proprietor of trade mark "mexpal" inrespect to goods of car polishes, and also having a copyright in a specific design, get-up, colour scheme etc. in relation to tin boxes in which the said goods are marketed and sold, alleging infringement of the said copyright on part of the defendants, and seeking a restraint order prohibiting them from manufacturing, selling or otherwise dealing in car polishes in the tin boxes identical or deceptively similar to those of the plaintiff.

( 2 ) THE area of controversy in the present case is very narrow, being restricted to the copyright in the design, colour scheme. shape and get-up of the tin-boxes, inasmuch as the trade mark of defendant s goods is wholly different for the reason that whereas the plaintiff s trade mark is "mexpal", that of the defendant s is "farishta". The plaintiff claims user since the year 1979. and registration of the copyright since 1980, when he got both his trade mark as







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top