SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Del) 946

A.D.SINGH, M.JAGANNADHA RAO
MONTARI OVERSEAS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
MONTARI INDUSTRIES LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
SANJIV PURI, U.K.CHAUDHARY

ANIL DEV SINGH, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal against the order of the learned single Judge dated March 1, 1995 passed in 1. A. 129/95 in Suit No. 43/95, whereby the appellant (defendant in the suit was injuncted from using the word momtari or any other word deceptively similar thereto as part of its corporate name.

( 2 ) THE facts giving rise to this appeal are as under:-

( 3 ) M/s. Montari Industries Ltd. the respondent (plaintiff in suit) was incorporated on January 27, 1983. As per the assertion of the respondent it has several subsidiaries namely Montari Leasing and Finance Ltd. , Montari Chem Care Investments Ltd. , Montari Agro Chem Investments Ltd. , Montari Leather Ltd. , Montari Financial services Ltd. and Montari Inks Ltd. The respondent and its subsidiaries are said to be manufacturing products like chemicals agro-chemicals, paints cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, leather articles, tea, coffee, clothing carpets, inks, food articles etc. The respodent also claims to have a. turn over of Rs. 90 crores.

( 4 ) THE appellant, on the other hand, M/s. Montary Oveseas Ltd. was incorporated on April 21, 1993. It is claimed that the fields of operation of the appellant and the responden


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top