SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Del) 268

G.C.JAIN
KALA NIKETAN – Appellant
Versus
KALA NIKETAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANUP SINGH, K.L.AGARWAL, MANMOHAN SINGH

G. C. JAIN, J.

( 1 ) IN this suit the plaingtiff, who carries of business as kala Niketan , seeks a decree for permanent injury tion restraining the defendant, its servants, agensts, representatives and dealers from directly or indirectly, dealing in Sarees and other textile goods as kala Niketan or any other identical or deceptively similar trade name; an order for destruction of dies, blocks, transfer labels and any other material bearing the impugned trade name and for rendition of accounts.

( 2 ) ACCORDING to the allegations in the plaint, the business of selling Sarees as kala Niketan was started by Shrimati Momi Devi at 2343/2, Ajmal Khan Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi, on April 7, 1957. In April 1958, she took her two sons, Shambhoo Nath Khanna and Krishan Lal Khanna, in partnership with her in the said business. Shambhoo Nath Khanna retired from the firm with effect from June 15, 1966. Shrimati Momi Devi also retired with effect from 1, 1972 after assigning her share and interests in the partnership business, goodwill, stocks etc. in favour of remaining partner, Krishan Lal Khanna, who was carrying on the said business as its sole proprietor since then. The trade name ka






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top