SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Del) 17

A.D.SINGH
PRADIP KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.C.MATHUR, NILAM GROVER, R.D.Jolly, R.K.Nasim, S.K.Makkar

Mr. Anil Dev Singh, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a criminal revision against the order of learned ASJ dated 20th March, 1992 whereby charge under Section 306 read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code was framed against the petitioners.

( 2 ) SMT. Veena was married to Subhash Chand sometime in January 1986 according to Hindu customs. The allegation against the revisionists, namely Pradeep Kumar, brother-in-law of the deceased, Km. Shashi and Km. Suman, sisters-in- law of the deceased and Smt. Raj Rani, mother-in-law of the deceased and Subhash Chand, husband of the deceased is that they used to harass the deceased and treated her with cruelty which drove her to despair resulting in her suicide.

( 3 ) ACCORDING to the dying declaration of the deceased, she resided in the house of her in-laws along- with her husband Subhash Chand, mother-in-law, two sisters- in-laws and brother in-law. There used to be altercations on small and trivial matters. Sisters-in-law used to quarrel with her and the mother-in-law and the husband did not cooperate with her. Suman, petitioner No. 4 slapped her about three and a half months before the incident and also pushed her and threw soap water in her eyes. Thereafter th







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top