SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Del) 114

P.N.NAG
P. S. BEDI – Appellant
Versus
PROJECT AND EQUIPMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.S.CHADHA, BHARAT DIPAK

P. N. Nag, J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiff has Filed the suit for ejectment against the defendant from property known as flat No. 9-B. Hansalaya Building. 1. 5, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi-110001 and for recovery of Rs. 4,26,560. 00 on account of damages and mesne profits for use and occupation of the premises from the date of termination of the tenancy till the date of the suit and for mesne profits.

( 2 ) THE facts set out in the plaint are that the plaintiff is the owner of the properly knownasflatno. 9-B,hansalaya Building, 15,barakhambaroad,newdelhi-l 10001. The aforementioned premises, which has a covered area of 1333 sq. ft. on the 9th floor in Hansalaya Building, as marked "b" in the plan was let out by the plaintiff to the defendant as monthly tenant initially at the rate of Rs. 5. 50 per ft. per month i. e. Rs. 7331. 50 per month from 30. 4. 1976 on the terms reduced in writing vide registered lease dated 6. 6. 1977. vide Registered No. 2261, book No-3816 on pages 84-87 dated23. 6. 1977. The said lease deed contemplated the tenancy for aperiod of three years commencing on 30. 4. 1977. The tenancy was thereafter extended twice, once unilaterally by the defendant and second time by m


























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top