P.K.BAHRI
KAILASH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
R. L. KAPUR – Respondent
( 1 ) THESE two appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated September 30, 1991, of the Rent Control Tribunal by which he had dismissed the appeals filed by the appellants and also another appeal filed by alleged sub-tenant Raja Ram against the eviction order passed by the Additional Rent Controller dated May 15, 1989, on the ground of eviction covered by clause (b) of proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 14 of the Delhi Rent Control Act.
( 2 ) FACTS, in brief, are that Sh. R. L. Kapur, landlord, had filed an eviction petition on the grounds of subletting, assignment and parting with possession of the different portions of the demised premises and on the ground of substantial damage. The ground of substantial damage was negatived by the Additional Rent Controller as well as by the Tribunal and no longer survives for consideration in these appeals.
( 3 ) ADMITTEDLY, shopno. 21,jangpura Extension, New Delhi, which consists of two shop rooms, store, shaft, WC godown, front verandah located on the ground floor as shown in red colour in plan filed alongwith the petition was let out to Smt. Prakash Wati in the name of hersole proprietary firm-M/s. Kailash Ku
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.