SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(SC) 46

H. J. KANIA, M. PATANJALI SASTRI, S. R. DASS
Sheodhari Rai – Appellant
Versus
Suraj Prasad Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
B.K.SARAN, H.P.SINHA, R.C.Prasad, S.P.SINHA, TARA CHAND BRIJMOHAN LAL, UDAIBHAN CHAUDHARY

Judgment

S. R. DAS, J.: This is an appeal by the defendants first party against the judgment and decree of the High Court of Patna (Manohar Lall and Ray JJ.) dated 23-2-1948, which reversed the decree of the Subordinate Judge at Chapra, dated 5-4-1945, and decreed the suit in favour of the plaintiffs.

2. The suit out of which the present appeal has arisen was instituted by the plaintiffs for a declaration of their title to, and confirmation of their possession of, certain lands and other ancillary reliefs. The plaintiffs claimed to have derived their title to the lands in suit by purchase from the defendant s second party by and under a registered deed of sale dated 19-7-1942. The relationship of the defendants second party was shown in a pedigree-table annexed to the plaint and reproduced below :

Janki Rai and Sharda Rai apparently left no issue.

3. The plaintiffs case was that on the deaths of Maida Kuer widow of Gobind Rai and of Buddha Kuer widow of Kari Rai Bator Rai (defendant 4) and Singhasan Rai (defendant 5) as their nearest reversioners inherited the shares of Gobind Rai and Kari Rai in the properties in suit. Thus at the date of the deed of sale in favour of the plaintiffs







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top