P.K.BAHRI
FAQIR CHAND – Appellant
Versus
LILA RAM – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS regular second appeal has been broughtagainst the judgment and decree dated 9/08/1974, of an Additionaldistrict Judge by which he had allowed the appeal of respondent Lila Ramagainst judgment and decree dated 31/01/1974, of a Sub-Judge and haddismissed the suit brought by the appellant against the respondent whereinreliefs of mandatory injunction, perpetual injunction and rendition ofaccounts were claimed.
( 2 ) THE dispute pertains to property bearing municipal No. 1 152 (Oldno. 272) situated in Gali Samosan, Farash Khana, Delhi. Admittely thisproperty was owned by Bhola Ram, father of the appellant. Lila Ramrespondent and one Kishan Lal. In 1921 Kishan Lal brought a suit forpartition and decree for partition was made and portion which is in browncolour in map Ex. Public Witness 3/2 had fallen to the share of Kishan Lal andultimately that portion also had been purchased by Lila Ram-respondent. In1983 the partition deed was executed between Bhola Ram and Lila Ram Ex. PW 3/1 which was duly registered and the map duly signed by the partieswas also registered which is Ex. Public Witness 3/2. The portion which fell to the shareof Bhola Ram is shown in light blue c
REFERRED TO : Krothapalli Satyanarayana v. Koganti Ramaiah and Ors.
Balakrishna Savalram Pujari Waghmare and Ors. v. Shree Dhyaneshwar Maharaj Sansthan and Ors.
Sheo Narayan Singh and Ors. v. Ambica Singhand Ors.
Moyya Butchamma v. Moyya Venkateswararao and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.