SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Del) 372

P.K.BAHRI
FAQIR CHAND – Appellant
Versus
LILA RAM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
I.S.MATHUR, L.D.ADLEKHA, RIPU ADLAKHA, TASLIM AHMEDI

P. K. Bahri

( 1 ) THIS regular second appeal has been broughtagainst the judgment and decree dated 9/08/1974, of an Additionaldistrict Judge by which he had allowed the appeal of respondent Lila Ramagainst judgment and decree dated 31/01/1974, of a Sub-Judge and haddismissed the suit brought by the appellant against the respondent whereinreliefs of mandatory injunction, perpetual injunction and rendition ofaccounts were claimed.

( 2 ) THE dispute pertains to property bearing municipal No. 1 152 (Oldno. 272) situated in Gali Samosan, Farash Khana, Delhi. Admittely thisproperty was owned by Bhola Ram, father of the appellant. Lila Ramrespondent and one Kishan Lal. In 1921 Kishan Lal brought a suit forpartition and decree for partition was made and portion which is in browncolour in map Ex. Public Witness 3/2 had fallen to the share of Kishan Lal andultimately that portion also had been purchased by Lila Ram-respondent. In1983 the partition deed was executed between Bhola Ram and Lila Ram Ex. PW 3/1 which was duly registered and the map duly signed by the partieswas also registered which is Ex. Public Witness 3/2. The portion which fell to the shareof Bhola Ram is shown in light blue c



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top