SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Del) 518

ARUN KUMAR, SUNANDA BHANDARE
PARENT FORUM FOR MEANINGFUL EDUCATION – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANIL KHER, PRATIBHA MURJANI, SHYAM MURJANI

Sunanda Bhandare

( 1 ) THIS petition filed in public interest seeksdirections in respect of examinations for Class X and Class XII conductedby the Central Board of Secondary Education. The main grievance of thepetitioners is regarding the use of multiple set of question papers for Classx and XII throughout the country, The petitioners pray that the Examinations Bye-Laws 1990 in so far as the same permit use of multiple set ofquestion papers be quashed and the decision based on the report of Madanmohan Committee and the Seminar held thereunder be also quashed. It wassubmitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioners that another writpetition being C. W. P. 843 of 1992 was filed in this Court by a student inwhich similar relief was sought because multiple set of question papers wereintroduced by the respondent for examinations to Class X and XII only indelhi to be held in March 1992. Learned Counsel submitted that thoughthe writ petition was disposed of primarily because the examinations wereheld immediately and all arrangements were complete. Still this Court hadmade certain observations while disposing of an application for interim relieffiled in that writ petition. In the said or













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top