SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Del) 608

SAT PAL
S. K. ENTERPRISES – Appellant
Versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.SALVAN, RAJIV SHARMA

Sat Pal

( 1 ) THIS application has been field on behalf of therespondent Delhi Development Authority (hereinafter REFERRED TO to as thedda ) under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. In this application it hasbeen prayed that the delay in filing the objections be condoned.

( 2 ) IN para 3 of the application it has been stated that the notice offiling of the award was received by the DDA on 1/10/1992. It isfurther stated that the Executive Engineer of the Division concernedprepared his comments on the award on 15/10/1992 and the samewere sent to the Chief Engineer for approval on the same date. Thereafterthe Chief Engineer gave his approval on 4/11/1992 and the filewas sent to the legal cell of DDA. On 18/11/1992 the legal cellof DDA is stated to have given its approval. It is then stated in theapplication that the file was mixed up with some other file and came to thenotice of the concerned officer only on 5/02/1993 and thereafter apanel lawyer was briefed and objections were filed on 18/02/1993. Reply to this application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner and ithas been stated in the reply that the explanation given by the DDA is notsatisfactory and as such the delay should n






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top