SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Del) 718

USHA MEHRA
KESHAV METAL WORKS – Appellant
Versus
JITENDER KUMAR VERMA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Aman Lekhi, Vijay Kishan

USHA MEHRA, J.

( 1 ) M/. S. Keshav Metal Works and Mrs. Manorma Vaid, petitioners herein were tenant in the premises bearing No. A-8/a-7/2 New Friends Colony, New Delhi. Respondent, Mr. J. K. Verma,landlord of the premises sought the eviction under Section 14 (1) (c) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (hereinafter called the DRC Act) on the ground of bonafide requirement. Brief facts are that the owner of the premises Mr. J. K. Verma was working in the Steel Authority of India Ltd at Delhi. He was transferred to Burnpur and thereafter retransferred to Delhi. He had taken loan from his employer for raising construction on the premises in question. His employer some where in June 1981 look the decision that those of the employees who had been sanctioned House Building Advance for building a house at the place of their posting should vacate the company allotted house. / lease accommodation within a period of one year l rom the date of issue of the said circular. This decision was conveyed to the petitioner vide letter dated 4. 2. 82. Since he was to vacate the company allotted house he needed this premises for his bonafide requirement for himself and members of his family as he had no alte





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top