SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Del) 19

ARUN KUMAR, B.N.KIRPAL
M. N. GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
UNIVERSITY OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.K.LAHRI, KAPIL SIBAL, Mamta Mehra, S.C.Malik Sayeed Uddin

Arun Kumar,j.

( 1 ) THE challenge in this writ petition is to the communication dated 13th August 1991 whereby petitioner No. 2, who is a member of the Governing Body of the Daulat Ram College (hereinafter REFERRED TO to as the college) has been removed from membership and the communication dated 14th August 1991 whereby the Vice Chancellor has nominated seven additional members to the Governing Body of the college for one year. Petitioner No. I has filed the present petition as Chairman and Member of the Governing Body of the college while petitioner No. 2 has filed the petition on his own behalf. The petitioners have raised various grounds in the writ petition in support of their case. However, we have confined our decision to the challenge on the ground of non-compliance with the principles of natural justice. We feel that the impugned actions of respondents 1 to 3 are liable to be struck down on this ground alone.

( 2 ) THE facts giving rise to the petition are that the college was started in the year 1960 as one of the constituent colleges of the University of Delhi. It has a Governing Body of fifteen members out of whom ten have been appointed by the Trust, two members are th











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top