SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Del) 319

P.N.NAG
KRISHAN LAL – Appellant
Versus
RAJAN CHAND KHANNA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARUN JAITLEY, JAGDIP KISHORE, MUKUL ROHTAGI, REKHA GUPTA, S.K.Kaul

P. N. Nag, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition under Section 25-B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (hereinafter reffered to as the "act") has been filed by the tenant-petitioner against the order dated 16. 7. 1991 passed by Smt. Sunita Gupta, Additional Rent Controller, Delhi whereby she has allowed the eviction petition of the respondent-landlord under Section 14 (l) (e) of the Act for bonafide requirement and consequently an order of eviction in respect of Kothi No. 5, Sri Ram Road, Delhi has been passed.

( 2 ) THE relevant facts as stated in the petition are the respondent-landlord was the owner of the premises in his capacity as the Karta of the Joint Hindu Family known as Rajan Chand Khanna and Sons comprising of the respondent-landlord himself, his wife and two sons. The premises Kothi No. 5, Sri Ram Road, Civil Lines, Delhi were let out to the tenant on a monthly rent of Rs. 198. 00 p. m. besides Rs. 26. 78 as house tax and Rs. 2. 00 p. m. as sweeper charges for residential purposes and has been used as such since the inception of the tenancy. The premises were let out in July, 1951 and no rent note was executed.

( 3 ) THE respohdent -landlord had been working with C. P. A. Con


























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top