SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Del) 378

C.L.CHAUDHRY
RAJINDER KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
R. K. BAJAJ – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.M.CHOPRA, G.R.CHOPRA, P.N.LEKHI, S.K.Luthra

C. L. Chaudhry

( 1 ). The plaintitiff has filed this suit seeking a decree of declaration that the judgment and decree dated 9. 11. 1989 passed in S. No. 2713/89 by this Court was obtained by collusion, fraud and is illegal and void and does not confer or create any right, title or interest in favour of defendants 1, 2 and 4 in property bearing No. A-167. Defence Colony.

( 2 ). The allegations made in the plaint are that the plaintiff is a tenant on the ground floor of House No. A-167, Defence Colo. y since 1969, on monthly rent of Rs. 250. 00. Bhagwan Dass was the original owner of the house and he sold it to Dev Raj Bajaj, detent. No. 3, vide sale deed d. . ted 10. 9. 1969. The plaintiff attorned in favour of deft. 3 at the instance of the previous owner, and deft. 3, thereafter, started receiving monthly rent from the plaintiff. Deft. 3, immediately after the purchase of the premises in question, with ulterior motive and design and to coerce the plaintiff to quit from the premises filed an eviction petition in 1970 u/s 14 (1) (b) and (g) of the Delhi Rent Control Act. In the petition, deft. 3 admitted that he was the purchaser of this property, by a registered sale deed. In 971,














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top