( 1 ) [ed. facts : One Jokhu Pershad s daughter who was alleged to be minor was missing and suspects were alleged to have a hand in her kidnapping etc. Tulsi Ram was alleged to be main culprit. He was taken to Police Station more than once. A lawyer applied for bail on his behalf. Report of the SHO was called for. The lawyer made another application levelling serious charges against the Police about atrocities being committed against Tulsi Ram suspect and also he was in Police custody since several days without producing him before a Magistrate. The Magistrate took serious view of the matter and started proceedings against Police officers. The latter moved High Court for quashing proceedings, pointing out besides other things that during the said period, the suspect was arrested by Kashmere Gate Police and on his confession had been convicted with fine. ] After detailing above facts, Judgment is :

( 2 ) THE main thing, therefore, that emerges in this case is that already an FIR No. 293/90 had been recorded u/s. 363 Indian Penal Code against Tulsi Ram and others. According to his own admission Tulsi Ram was interrogated in respect of the disappearance of Lakshmi even on 4.