SANTOSH DUGGAL
RAVI GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
VIDYA WATI – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS revision petition under Section 25-B (B) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, (for short the Act ), has been filed after petitioner s application for leave to contest the petition was declined. The eviction petition had been filed by the landlady under the provisions of Section 14-D of the Act, pleading that she was landlady of premises : bearing No. B-368, Nirman Vihar. Delhi, which were let out to the petitioner herein in the year 1981, and that she was a widow. She has set out in detail the reasons as to why she sought vacant possession, stating that the demised premises were the only property owned by her, and that these were let out to the tenant for residential purposes, and now she required them for her own residence as she had no other alternative reasonable accommodation. She further pleaded that she had been constrained to hire a rented accommodation in Delhi consisting of one room only with a small kitchen situated in a congested locality and the same were highly inadequate for her requirements, because she needed the amenity of a drawing-cum-dining room, a store room, as also a pooja room besides independent bath room which facility the tenante
REFERRED TO : Surjlt Singh Kalra v.Union of Indta and Others
EMC Steel Limited, Calcutta v. Union of India and Another
K.L. Malhotra v. Prakash Mehra (Smt.)
Precision Steel and Engineering Works and Another v. Prem Deva Niranjan Deva Tayal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.