SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Del) 502

SANTOSH DUGGAL
RAVI GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
VIDYA WATI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARUN MOHAN, CHITRA MARKANDEYA, R.K.Anand, S.P.CHUGH, T.K.GANJU

Santosh Duggal

( 1 ) THIS revision petition under Section 25-B (B) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, (for short the Act ), has been filed after petitioner s application for leave to contest the petition was declined. The eviction petition had been filed by the landlady under the provisions of Section 14-D of the Act, pleading that she was landlady of premises : bearing No. B-368, Nirman Vihar. Delhi, which were let out to the petitioner herein in the year 1981, and that she was a widow. She has set out in detail the reasons as to why she sought vacant possession, stating that the demised premises were the only property owned by her, and that these were let out to the tenant for residential purposes, and now she required them for her own residence as she had no other alternative reasonable accommodation. She further pleaded that she had been constrained to hire a rented accommodation in Delhi consisting of one room only with a small kitchen situated in a congested locality and the same were highly inadequate for her requirements, because she needed the amenity of a drawing-cum-dining room, a store room, as also a pooja room besides independent bath room which facility the tenante


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top