M. N. VENKATACHALIAH, R. S. PATHAK
Dipti Narayan Srimani: Controller Of Estate Duty, W. B. – Appellant
Versus
Controller Of Estate Duty, W. B. : Dipti Narayan Srimani – Respondent
Judgment
VENKATACHALIAH, J. :- These appeals, by certificate, under S. 65 of the Estate Duty Act of 1953 (Act for short) - one by the accountable person and the other by the Deputy Controller of the Estate Duty - arise out of and are directed against the judgment dated, 11-10-74 of the High Court of Calcutta, answering, in a reference under S. 64(1) of the Act, the question of law referred for its opinion,
The matter pertained to the determination of the principal value of the estate passing on the death, which occurred on 24-3-1960, of a certain Satya Charan Srimani. Dipti Narayan Srimani, appellant in C.A. 946/1975 is the son of the deceased and is the accountable person.
2. The said Satya Charan Srimani during his lifetime had executed three trust deeds, dated, 8-12-1947, 21-9-1953 and 4-10-1959 respectively. In the proceedings, the nature and effect of the dispositions made under the deeds of the trust, dated 21-9-1953 and 4-10-1959 fell for consideration.
Under the deed, dated 21-9-1953, Satya Charan Srimani as settlor transferred upon trust to himself as trustee 4 items of immovable property, viz., 130 and 133, upper circular Road, and 32/5 and 32/6 Beadon Street, Calcutta. The o
Controller of Estate Duly v. Smt. Godavan Bai
Controller of Estate Duty v. M/s R. V. Vishwanathan
relied on : Angurbaia Mulliek V. Debabrata Mullick
Kalipada Chakraborti v. Palam Bala Devi
Collector of Estate Duty v. R. Kanakasabai
distinguished : Controller of Estate Duty v. Mahant Umesh Narain Puri
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.