High Court Of Delhi
OM PARKASH ALIAS OMI ALIAS FAUZI - Appellant
Versus
STATE - Respondent
CRIMINAL APPEAL 115 of 1989
Decided On : 05/29/1991
NDPS Act - Possession of Charas - S. 42, S. 50, S. 55 - The court discussed the provisions of S. 42, S. 50, and S. 55 of the NDPS Act, emphasizing the requirements for search, seizure, and arrest without warrant. The court also highlighted the obligation to inform the accused of their right to be searched in the presence of a Gazetted Officer or a Magistrate under S. 50, and the consequences of non-compliance with this provision.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant was apprehended with 6 Kg 500 grams of charas. He was convicted under S. 20 of the NDPS Act and sentenced to 12 years of rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 1 lakh. The appellant challenged the conviction and sentence.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the prosecution had complied with the mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act regarding search, seizure, and arrest. The court confirmed the findings of the trial court and dismissed the appeal.
Issues: Non-compliance with mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act, including S. 42, S. 50, and S. 55, and the sufficiency of evidence provided by the prosecution.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the prosecution had fulfilled the requirements of the NDPS Act, and minor contradictions in the statements of witnesses did not undermine the overall evidence. The court emphasized the importance of strict compliance with the Act's provisions and confirmed the conviction and sentence.
Final Decision: The court confirmed the appellant's conviction under S. 20 of the NDPS Act and upheld the sentence of 12 years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 1 lakh.
( 2 ) DURING investigation, it also transpired that one Sher Sing alias Shera was also involved in that business of sale of charas/ opium. He was also arrested and challenged along with this appellant for offences punishable u/ss. 20 and 29 of the NDPS Act.
( 3 ) THE trial Court acquitted Sher Singh alias Shera of the charge levelled against him. However, the appellant was found guilty for an offence punishable u/s. 20 Part II of the NDPS Act for having in his possession 6 Kg 500 grams of charas in contravention of S. 8 of the NDPS Act and he was convicted for the said offence and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 12 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1 lakh and in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year for the said offence by the Addl. Sessions Judge Delhi by his judgment and order, dated 8-8-89 and 10-8-89.
( 4 ) AGGRIEVED, the appellant has filed this appeal.
( 5 ) MR. D. R. Sethi, learned counsel for the appellant, submitted that the provisions of NDPS Act being mandatory have to be strictly construed especially in view of the minimum sentence of imprisonment and fine prescribed under the Act leaving no discretion to the trial Court to impose a lesser sentence of imprisonment or
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.