Y.K.SABHARWAL
SIMAX CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
STATE BANK OF INDIA – Respondent
( 1 ) IN the suit plaintiff has sought a decree declaring that two letters dated 3rd July 1991 issued by defendant No. 2 invoking the bank guarantees mentioned in the said letters are illegal, inoperative and void. Plaintiff has also sought a decree for permanent injunction against defendant No. 1 State Bank of India from making payment to defendant No. 2 of Rs. 5 lakhs and Rs. 4,38,000. 00 being the amounts of the two bank guarantees. The plaintiff has further prayed that defendant No. 2 shall be restrained from receiving the said amounts from defendant No. 1. By this application filed under 0. 39, Rr. 1 and 2 read with S. 151, Civil Procedure Code plaintiff prays that pending the decision of the suit defendant No. 1 be restrained from making payments and defendant No. 2 be restrained from receiving the said payments of the said bank guarantees. Briefly, the facts pleaded in the plaint are as under:
( 2 ) THE plaintiff is a private limited com- pany engaged in the construction of civil works. Defendant No. 2 by notice advertised for pre-qualification of bidders for construc- tion of a complex at Bikaner. The bid of the plaintiff being the lowest was accepted. Communi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.