SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(SC) 45

D. A. DESAI, M. H. BEG, P. N. BHAGWATI
Udai Chand – Appellant
Versus
Shankar Lal – Respondent


Advocates:
Badri Das Sharma, DALVIR BHANDARI, L.M.SINGHVI, S.K.JAIN, S.M.Jain, S.R.SHRIVASTAVA

JUDGMENT

M. H. BEG, C.J.I. :— The plaintiff landlord had purchased a shop by a sale deed dated 17th May 1965, and then terminated the tenancy of the defendant petitioner by a registered notice in July, 1965, coupled with a demand for arrears of rent. Upon the failure of defendant to comply with the notice to quit a suit was filed against the defendant petitioner on 23rd November, 1965. During the pendency of that suit the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1950, was made applicable by a notification dated 30th March, 1967, to Rajgarh town where the shop is situated.

2. The defendant-petitioner had denied having executed any rent note in favour of Bhurdas, the predecessor-in interest of the plaintiff landlord who had also notified the defendant petitioner of the sale in favour of the plaintiff by a registered notice dated 25th June, 1965, received by the defendant petitioner on 29th June, 1965. The defendant petitioner pleaded having taken the shop from another individual, Mahant Ram Ratan Das.

3. In the course of litigation, the defendant-petitioner had asked for an issue to be framed on the question whether there was legal necessity for the transfer in favour of th



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top