SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Del) 66

P.K.BAHRI
SANTOKH SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.R.Sethi, Kamini Lao, R.P.Lao, Rajesh Batra

BAHRI,j.

( 1 ) VIDE Judgament daled July 7, 1989, the appellant has been convicted of an offence punishable under Section 21 of N. D. P. S. Act of having been found in possession of 1 Kilogram of heroin and has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 12 years and to pay a fine of rupees one lac and in default in the payment of fine, to undergo further simple imprisonment for a period of three years. Appellant has filed this appeal challenging his conviction and the sentences.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case, in brief, are that Swatanter Kumar, S. I. , Public Witness -7 and S. I. Joginder Singh Public Witness -6 of the Crime Branch had some secret information that appellant Satnokh Singh, Bhupinder Singh and Varinder Sharma who belongedi to Punjab were touring in Haryana and they have been bringing heroin from Punjab and disposing of the same to some customers in Delhi. They had put some secret informer to get some specific information about their movements in Delhi and on January 21, 1986 at about 6 P. M. secret informer came to the Crime Branch and disclosed that the said three persons would be supplying the heroin to some customer near Tirath Ram Hospital and they would b
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top