SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Del) 41

SANTOSH DUGGAL
RAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
S. S. MANNON – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.R.Priani, K.K.BAKSHI

Santosh Duggal

( 1 ) [ed. facts : On 29. 4. 87, petitioner an S. I. (security) with wife, children and 2 relatives was after taking dinner at Hotel Satkar, Green Park, standing near the road while wife with children had gone to Pan Vendor for taking Pan Petitioner noticing some quarrel between his wife and one of the 3 boys standing at the Pan shop, went near and a brawl started. Respdt. Manan, who was on Patrol duty in a Police Jeep happened to pass that way. Seeing the commotion he took the petitioner and the boys to Police station and there asked the Duty Officer (S. I. Brijpal) to get petitioner medically examined as he was smelling liquor. After doing this and after making entries in the record, petitioner and the boys were allowed to go. Before this petitioner s wife had lodged a complaint with Duty Officer for misbehaviour against the 3 boys. Petitioner claiming that he informed these facts to his boss, Additional D. C. P. (s) and finding no action he filed criminal complaint u/ss. 323, 365, 217, 218 Indian Penal Code against the ACP and S. I. Brij Pal and against the 3 boys u/s 354, 365/34 IPC. The Met. Mgte. after preliminary evidence held that no case was made out u/ss. 36

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top